![]() ![]() In fact, among the skeptical scholars who try to discern the truth about “the historical Jesus” (as opposed to “the Christ of faith”), the Jesus-as-failed-political-revolutionary view is not the dominant one. ![]() It’s certainly been proposed before, but it is far from the only view out there. 100 and 120!)Īt these late dates, Aslan informs us, Christians wanted to de-couple their religion from the failed political messianism that resulted in the destruction of Jerusalem, and so the gospels falsify their depiction of Jesus and make him a non-revolutionary.ĩ) How widely received is this view in the scholarly community? (He dates Matthew and Luke to between A.D. ![]() However, they are apparently reliable whenever they say something that he can use to support his thesis.Īccording to Aslan, all of the Gospels were written after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. The claim is that Jesus was just one of the many zealot-like revolutionaries of the time.Īslan then cherry-picks the evidence of the gospels, accepting whatever agrees with his thesis and discarding everything that doesn’t.Ĩ) How does he explain the fact that the gospels do not depict Jesus as a political revolutionary?Īccording to Aslan, the gospels were written long after the fact and are unreliable on these points. This is where the book gets its title- Zealot. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |